L'ETCAF et le Système de Justice

Sélection de la langue

English {EN}French (Fr)
  • An Image Slideshow
  • An Image Slideshow
  • An Image Slideshow
  • An Image Slideshow
  • An Image Slideshow
  • An Image Slideshow
  • An Image Slideshow
  • An Image Slideshow
  • An Image Slideshow
  • An Image Slideshow
  • An Image Slideshow
  • An Image Slideshow
  • An Image Slideshow
  • An Image Slideshow
  • An Image Slideshow
  • An Image Slideshow
  • An Image Slideshow
  • An Image Slideshow
  • An Image Slideshow
  • An Image Slideshow
  • An Image Slideshow
  • An Image Slideshow
  • An Image Slideshow
  • An Image Slideshow
  • An Image Slideshow
Assessment to Determine FASD

Severe Glossary Link FASD has been recognized at least since the 1993 case of R. v. TJ (see [1999] YJ No. 57) as a ‘disease of the mind’ capable of bringing an individual within the mental disorder provisions of the Criminal Code.

BC jurisprudence suggests that specific FASD assessments cannot be ordered pursuant to the Criminal Code, but one Nunavut court has found that they may be ordered under the YCJA. The BCCA has also recognized the barriers to getting assessments.

Below is a list of cases:

Alberta v. RJH, 2006 ABQB 656
DO/LTO Applications - R. v. GNB/R v. Bunn, 2011 SKQB 21
R. v. Gray, 2002 BCSC 1192
R. v. Harris, 2002 BCCA 152
R. v. Mackenzie2005 BCPC 106, 2009 BCPC 57,2007 BCPC 109
R. v. Synnuck, 2005 BCCA 155:
R. v. TK, 2006 NUCJ 15
R. v. Williams, [1994] BCJ No. 3160, 1994 CanLII 576